[Standards] XEP-0047: IBB
stpeter at stpeter.im
Sun Feb 28 23:58:25 UTC 2010
On 2/19/10 3:05 AM, Fabio Forno wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>> If I understand your comment correctly, I would change the text as follows:
> fine, just a doubt about SHOULD or MAY temporarily suspend... I'm not
> sure it is the general desired behavior, but just for some
> applications like long living bytestreams. What happens in other cases
> when a file jingle transfer fails while going on? I think the general
> case is re-negotiating the jingle session and send the remaining part
> of the file.
Isn't that handled at a layer above XEP-0047?
> I'd suggest to retry in case of timeout in the IQ too (if we have an
> already established ibb, resending the IQ for a while is the sane
> thing imho).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6820 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards