[Standards] XEP-0198 acknowledgements feedback
mwild1 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 11 14:52:44 UTC 2010
On 11 June 2010 15:50, Matthew Wild <mwild1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7 June 2010 18:16, Matthew Wild <mwild1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Having recently implemented an initial version of XEP-0198
>> acknowledgements support for Prosody, I have some feedback:
> Now on the resumption part... why:
> I'm also lacking a defined way for the server to say that setting up
> acknowledgements was successful, but resumption wasn't (e.g. not
> supported). It seems wrong to deny both when one of them could work.
I take this part back, I was looking for an error but I just noticed
that availability of resumption can be signaled by resume='false' in
the <enabled/> element.
More information about the Standards