[Standards] XEP-0184: <received/> vs. <displayed/> vs. <read/>

Yann Leboulanger asterix at lagaule.org
Wed Jun 16 18:21:51 UTC 2010

On 06/16/2010 08:15 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Peter Saint-Andre<stpeter at stpeter.im>  wrote:
>> I just had an interesting conversation with "yagiza" about XEP-0184,
>> which he has said I can paste here. The general idea is: do we need
>> something in XEP-0184 to indicate that a message has been read by the
>> intended recipient? This would be similar to the<displayed/>  element in
>> XEP-0022. I'm not convinced that we need this feature in XEP-0184, and
>> tried to explain why to yagiza. Further discussion is welcome on this
>> list. I've attached the log of my chat with yagiza for context.
> The text already says that the receipt isn't sent until the message is
> presented to the user, which seems to be exactly the behaviour
> discussed - that the message was in the window the user had selected
> at the time. So the XEP already covers this.
> What it doesn't cover is acking messages as soon as the client has
> received them and before they're presented to the user -  we have 198
> to do exactly that.

It's not what I understood from this XEP, and it's not what is 
implemented in Gajim.

Requirements says "Enable a sender to request notification that an XMPP 
message stanza has been received." received here doesn't mean displayed 

Does't chat state 'active' mean that window has focus so we can imagine 
message has been presented?


More information about the Standards mailing list