[Standards] XEP-0184: <received/> vs. <displayed/> vs. <read/>

Yann Leboulanger asterix at lagaule.org
Thu Jun 17 13:45:33 UTC 2010


On 06/17/2010 03:29 PM, Konstantin Kozlov wrote:
> Kevin Smith wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Konstantin Kozlov <yagiza at yandex.ru>
>> wrote:
>>> Yes. Let's sort out what means "received", "displayed" and "read" to
>>> decide which of them are needed and which are not.
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> So:
>> What's the use case for needing to know when the user's client has
>> received the message?
> If sender wants to be sure, that client on the other side received and
> processed the message. So, the sender is sure that once the user on the
> other side will pay attention to its client application, he'll be able
> to read the message.
> If delivery of all the previous messages were confirmed by the <received
> /> reply and THIS one was not, the sender may assume, that the message
> was lost somehow and may try to resend it (if he wants).

This helps knowing which messages are lost in cases of brutal 
disconnection, decrypt failure, ...



More information about the Standards mailing list