[Standards] XEP-0184: <received/> vs. <displayed/> vs. <read/>

Yann Leboulanger asterix at lagaule.org
Sat Jun 19 11:11:44 UTC 2010

On 06/19/2010 10:40 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:

> I think the counterpoint to this is true, but not this, isn't it?
> <received/>  helps you know that a message was not lost due to brutal
> disconnection (etc.) - but the lack of a<received/>  doesn't imply
> that it *was* lost (there's a chunk of text about this in 184 at the
> moment).

The XEP is useless if a client announce it supports the XEP but decide 
to not reply. So except if <received/> iq is lost, I don't see any 
reason to not receive the reply.


More information about the Standards mailing list