[Standards] XEP-0047: IBB
stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Mar 11 04:30:51 UTC 2010
Ciao Fabio! :)
On 2/28/10 4:58 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 2/19/10 3:05 AM, Fabio Forno wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>>> If I understand your comment correctly, I would change the text as follows:
>> fine, just a doubt about SHOULD or MAY temporarily suspend... I'm not
>> sure it is the general desired behavior, but just for some
>> applications like long living bytestreams. What happens in other cases
>> when a file jingle transfer fails while going on? I think the general
>> case is re-negotiating the jingle session and send the remaining part
>> of the file.
> Isn't that handled at a layer above XEP-0047?
>> I'd suggest to retry in case of timeout in the IQ too (if we have an
>> already established ibb, resending the IQ for a while is the sane
>> thing imho).
I've tried to clarify these matters (and the block size issues) in
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6820 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards