[Standards] XEP-0045 message ids

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Nov 10 13:56:26 UTC 2010

On 11/10/10 9:55 PM, Tuomas Koski wrote:
> Hi,
> On 10 November 2010 13:30, Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net> wrote:
>> Personally, I consider the two stanzas - occupant to MUC, and MUC to
>> occupants - to be distinct, just having the same (or similar, at least)
>> payloads - and therefore have different ids (indeed, different per
>> occupant). Everyone else seems to consider this a silly idea.
> Just to let you know, you are not alone. I would have implemented it
> like that as well (having different ids).

Yes, I think they would be different per occupant. How can the MUC
service track errors otherwise?


Peter Saint-Andre

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20101110/6180276d/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list