[Standards] MUC actor

Matthew Wild mwild1 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 6 03:24:57 UTC 2011


Following the MUC theme, we had a little discussion today in jabber at .
Something I hadn't really noticed before is that the <actor> element
in MUC (the one that tells you who performed an action like a kick or
a ban) specifies that you must use the bare JID of the actor.

This seems a really strange thing to do, especially in an anonymous
room - not only do you not know who the person was (if you can't see
real JIDs), it unnecessarily exposes the admin's private JID to
someone who was worth kicking from a room :) Granted, the room is free
to not give any actor, but some people want to see who did what, in
some rooms it provides accountability.

I think being able to use a nickname for the actor is a decent enough
middle ground to be reasonable. It turns out it is not that hard to do
protocol-wise either. The <actor> element currently has a 'jid'
attribute, and we can add a 'nick' attribute as well.

The only downside to this is backwards-compatibility. I haven't tested
any, but it might upset some clients to see an <actor> with no 'jid'.

Thoughts?

Matthew



More information about the Standards mailing list