[Standards] MUC actor
Florent Le Coz
louiz at louiz.org
Fri Apr 8 19:00:39 UTC 2011
On 04/08/2011 08:56 PM, Florent Le Coz wrote:
> The server could still set a “jid” attribute, for backward
> compatibility, but with the room fulljid instead.
> <actor nick='MattJ' jid='prosody at conference.prosody.im/MattJ' /> on an
> anonymous room.
> <actor nick='MattJ' jid='mattj at realserver.com' /> on a non-anonymous one.
> That would not break existing clients, and fix the “privacy issue” even
> with them.
> What do you think?
(aha, I didn’t see the rest of this thread before sending that…
I should scroll to the bottom :))
Anyway, “always the full room jid as the ‘jid’ attribute” seems ok for
More information about the Standards