[Standards] MUC actor

Matthew A. Miller linuxwolf at outer-planes.net
Mon Apr 11 19:08:36 UTC 2011


On Apr 11, 2011, at 13:04 , Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> On 4/6/11 8:11 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
>> On 6 April 2011 14:54, Kevin Smith <kevin at kismith.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Matthew A. Miller
>>> <linuxwolf at outer-planes.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 6, 2011, at 07:48 , Kevin Smith wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Matthew A. Miller
>>>>> <linuxwolf at outer-planes.net> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> That's what I'm suggesting;  Have "jid" be the full occupant JID, not the real bare JID.  No need for a "nick" attribute, IMO.
>>> 
>>> Right. Just make the actor always the full room JID, never the real
>>> JID, sounds good to me.
>>> 
>> 
>> +1. It's still a potentially breaking change, but probably less so as
>> it doesn't change the schema :)
> 
> But in that case why not make it 'nick' as in the other parts of the
> spec? Typically 'jid' in XEP-0045 means "real JID" and 'nick' means
> "roomnick". I don't think we use 'jid' to mean room at service/nick
> anywhere else in MUC.
> 
> Peter

The reasoning here is using "jid" is (or appears to be) much less of a breaking change than "nick".  Maybe if this were a pre-draft spec, we'd be more comfortable moving to "nick"; but it's not, so we're not (-:


- m&m

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2238 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20110411/dd5616a5/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list