[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0220 (Server Dialback)

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Apr 14 17:26:45 UTC 2011

On 4/14/11 7:41 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 4/14/11 5:45 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
>> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>>> Preferably, the receiving server would not include the old namespace
>>>>> at all
>>>>> on the stream in response to a 1.0 stream.  It just confuses matters.
>>>>> And
>>>>> on stream restarts, the old ns should not be used at all by either
>>>>> side.
>>> Ah, I see what you mean -- if you *know* that the other side knows about
>>> XMPP 1.0 then use the stream feature exclusively.
>> which is a problem because the dialback stream feature is an
>> afterthought and not "xmpp 1.0".
> Stream features are 1.0, but the dialback stream feature is not.
>> I would propose to get rid of the first bullet (and associated text) in
>> section 2.3. This "new" method of signalling support for dialback does
>> not offer any advantages.
>> That way, the stream feature is only used to signal support for dialback
>> error handling.
> I think that would be OK.

I'm going to push out a revised XEP shortly to fix this matter. After
that I hope we can finally publish this as a Draft spec. :)


Peter Saint-Andre

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20110414/1456cf49/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list