[Standards] XEP-0178 1.1rc3
stpeter at stpeter.im
Tue Apr 19 22:09:54 UTC 2011
On 4/14/11 3:32 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 4/14/11 3:30 PM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
>> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> I *think* that this discussion thread leads to the following text in
>>> Section 3, but please double-check it.
>>> 10. Server1 considers EXTERNAL to be its preferred SASL mechanism. For
>>> server-to-server authentication the<auth/> element MUST NOT include an
>>> authorization identity (thus Server1 includes an empty response of "="
>>> as shown in RFC 6120).
>>> <auth xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-sasl'
>>> Interoperability Note: Previous versions of this specification relied on
>>> the authorization identity being present on the receiving server. Even
>>> though this is no longer required, the connecting server should include
>>> it for backward compability.
>> MUST NOT include but should include for backward compability?
>> Include it always and blame it on me (even though I don't have the old
>> logs from 2006).
>> I am not sure if backward compability really matters, the last time I
>> checked I offered EXTERNAL to three servers... jabber.org,
>> dave.cridland.net and some host running prosody.
> Right. Let's get some feedback Dave Cridland and Matthew Wild, at the
> least. I'm not sure that we have any implementations with which to be
> backward compatible. :)
Please see the latest version, reflecting what I think is the consensus
from list discussions:
The XMPP Council will be considering this tomorrow, feel free to join
the meeting at 15:00 in xmpp:council at muc.xmpp.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards