[Standards] XEP-0178 1.1rc3

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Mon Apr 25 18:02:12 UTC 2011


On 4/20/11 9:00 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 4/20/11 7:42 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
>>>>> I am not sure if backward compability really matters, the last time I
>>>>> checked I offered EXTERNAL to three servers... jabber.org,
>>>>> dave.cridland.net and some host running prosody.
>>>>
>>>> Right. Let's get some feedback Dave Cridland and Matthew Wild, at the
>>>> least. I'm not sure that we have any implementations with which to be
>>>> backward compatible. :)
>>>
>>> Please see the latest version, reflecting what I think is the consensus
>>> from list discussions:
>>>
>>> http://xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0178-1.1.html
>>>
>>> http://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0178/diff/1.0/vs/1.1rc4
>>
>> Not related to the diff, but I just spotted this:
>> S2S step 9: no match -> close => MAY close or may allow dialback?
> 
> Ah yes, TLS+Dialback? ;-)
> 
> Changed in my working copy to:
> 
> If no match is found, Server2 MAY either close Server1's TCP connection
> or continue with a Server Dialback [8] negotiation.
> 
>> S2S step 10: I think MUST NOT is too strong. After all, XMPP is deployed
>> using the EXTERNAL mechanism (see the xmppwg charter :-), so
>> we can not change the rules that way.
>> MAY include (for interop reasons) with a note that a future version may
>> remove this (actually I think that EXTERNAL will be deprecated in favor
>> of d-w-d before that happens)? That way we have a clear migration path.
> 
> OK.
> 
> Changed in my working copy to:
> 
> For server-to-server authentication, the <auth/> element MAY include an
> authorization identity, however a future version of this specification
> might disallow use of the authorization identity in server-to-server
> authentication (in the following example, Server1 includes an empty
> response of "=" as shown in RFC 6120).
> 
>> Note #7 is obsolete, that spec is 0238 - which is deprecated so it does
>> not make sense to add a reference.
> 
> True. And the dialback flows will be in d-w-d anyway, I'd think. Removed.

BTW, I checked over 1.1rc5 and found a few typos and infelicities, so
I've checked 1.1rc6 into git:

http://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0178/diff/1.1rc5/vs/1.1rc6

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20110425/5a183065/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list