[Standards] RFC vs privacy lists

Yann Leboulanger asterix at lagaule.org
Wed Apr 27 18:52:27 UTC 2011


On 04/27/2011 08:02 PM, Remko Tronçon wrote:
>> That's normal because RFC [1] says that "Privacy lists MUST be the first
>> delivery rule applied by a server, superseding ..."
>
> XEP 16 (copied from the RFC), section 2.14 says that the server should
> return service-unavailable.

Really? I See the case where a blocked entity attempts to send me an iq, 
not he case where I send an iq to my server (which is a blocked entity 
because it's not in my roster)

-- 
Yann



More information about the Standards mailing list