[Standards] RFC vs privacy lists

Yann Leboulanger asterix at lagaule.org
Thu Apr 28 13:13:46 UTC 2011


Le 28/04/2011 10:31, Dave Cridland a écrit :
>>> The easiest way to fix this (IMHO) is probably to send the user a type
>>> error IQ whenever he is trying to send a type get/set one to a JID that
>>> is blocked from answering.
>>> That does not fix your problem however and I maintain that the solution
>>> to that is to allow entities that you want to receive IQs from to send
>>> you IQs :).
>>
>> That will partialy solve my problem: At least I'll get an iq error and
>> it'll be ok with RFC.
>> And then yes, I'll contact tkabber devs to whitelist the server in
>> their anti-spam rule.
>
> Or there's XEP-0191.
>
> What prevents people using that? I know you can't do invisibility
> through it, but there's always XEP-0186 for that. Otherwise it seems
> vastly simpler and a much clearer specification, too.

Unfortunatly the goal of this XEP is not met: latest ejabberd and 
prosody don't implement that XEP. I've not checked other servers.

-- 
Yann



More information about the Standards mailing list