[Standards] RFC vs privacy lists

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Thu Apr 28 13:52:29 UTC 2011


On Thu Apr 28 14:49:35 2011, Evgeniy Khramtsov wrote:
> 28.04.2011 23:19, Matthew Wild wrote:
>> On 28 April 2011 14:13, Yann Leboulanger<asterix at lagaule.org>   
>> wrote:
>>    
>>> 
>>> Unfortunatly the goal of this XEP is not met: latest ejabberd and  
>>> prosody
>>> don't implement that XEP. I've not checked other servers.
>>> 
>>>      
>> http://code.google.com/p/prosody-modules/wiki/mod_blocking
>> 
>> It's waiting for client support, testing, and feedback before we  
>> can
>> include it in a release.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Matthew
>> 
>>    
> 
> There is a patch available for ejabberd as well:  
> https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-695

And just to join the vapourware announcements, the next release of  
M-Link will be shipping with XEP-0191 as well. We've also implemented  
a XEP-0050 suite of commands to control it, in order to side-step the  
client/server/chicken/egg problem to some degree.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at dave.cridland.net
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade



More information about the Standards mailing list