[Standards] RFC vs privacy lists
stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Apr 28 14:14:23 UTC 2011
On 4/28/11 9:52 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Thu Apr 28 14:49:35 2011, Evgeniy Khramtsov wrote:
>> 28.04.2011 23:19, Matthew Wild wrote:
>>> On 28 April 2011 14:13, Yann Leboulanger<asterix at lagaule.org> wrote:
>>>> Unfortunatly the goal of this XEP is not met: latest ejabberd and
>>>> don't implement that XEP. I've not checked other servers.
>>> It's waiting for client support, testing, and feedback before we can
>>> include it in a release.
>> There is a patch available for ejabberd as well:
> And just to join the vapourware announcements, the next release of
> M-Link will be shipping with XEP-0191 as well. We've also implemented a
> XEP-0050 suite of commands to control it, in order to side-step the
> client/server/chicken/egg problem to some degree.
In fact it might have been better to just do ad-hoc commands, but the
feedback at the time was that people wanted a simple, one-off control
for "block this user". At least that's how I interpreted the feedback...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards