[Standards] RFC vs privacy lists

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Apr 28 14:14:23 UTC 2011

On 4/28/11 9:52 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Thu Apr 28 14:49:35 2011, Evgeniy Khramtsov wrote:
>> 28.04.2011 23:19, Matthew Wild wrote:
>>> On 28 April 2011 14:13, Yann Leboulanger<asterix at lagaule.org>  wrote:
>>>> Unfortunatly the goal of this XEP is not met: latest ejabberd and
>>>> prosody
>>>> don't implement that XEP. I've not checked other servers.
>>> http://code.google.com/p/prosody-modules/wiki/mod_blocking
>>> It's waiting for client support, testing, and feedback before we can
>>> include it in a release.
>>> Regards,
>>> Matthew
>> There is a patch available for ejabberd as well:
>> https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-695
> And just to join the vapourware announcements, the next release of
> M-Link will be shipping with XEP-0191 as well. We've also implemented a
> XEP-0050 suite of commands to control it, in order to side-step the
> client/server/chicken/egg problem to some degree.

In fact it might have been better to just do ad-hoc commands, but the
feedback at the time was that people wanted a simple, one-off control
for "block this user". At least that's how I interpreted the feedback...


Peter Saint-Andre

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20110428/09799224/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list