[Standards] XEP-0198 status
stpeter at stpeter.im
Sat Feb 12 13:20:24 UTC 2011
On 2/12/11 5:09 AM, Remko Tronçon wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>> I think using RFC3986 (2732) formatting rules for supporting IPv6
>> address/port in a single attribute would be fine. Any software that intends
>> to communicate over IPv6 is probably going to need to understand that format
>> at some point.
> Well, we haven't needed it so far, and this XEP would be the first
> time we do, but I may be missing something. That's why I'm also in
> favor of splitting it into a separate attribute.
"It" = IPv6? We might need it soon. ;-)
In any case, splitting the host/IP and port into separate attributes is
fine with me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards