[Standards] XEP-0198 status

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Wed Jan 12 20:29:16 UTC 2011


On Wed Jan 12 20:26:52 2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> That seems mostly reasonable to me. I see a possible edge case if  
> the
> reconnecion address (ip:port or host:port or whatever) isn't  
> actually
> there by the time the initiating entity tries to reconnect, i.e.,  
> the
> server tells me the reconnection address and a few days later when  
> my
> session dies I finally try to reconnect but the address that the  
> server
> *thought* was going to work a few days ago isn't so much alive  
> anymore.
> Do we need to worry about that? If so, does the initiating entity  
> just
> follow the rules from 3920bis regarding the connection process?  
> (See for
> instance the rules for <see-other-host/> in 3920bis...)

If it's a case of "This is the place you should reconnect to first"  
that seems reasonable - so if it fails, move onto standard 3920  
sleection.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at dave.cridland.net
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade



More information about the Standards mailing list