[Standards] RTT: no negotiation of the feature

Kevin Smith kevin at kismith.co.uk
Fri Jun 24 14:13:37 UTC 2011

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Mark Rejhon <markybox at gmail.com> wrote:
> Re: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/realtimetext.html
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga at isode.com>
> wrote:
>> I am quite concerned that the current spec offers zero negotiation of the
>> extension before its use.
>> I urge the authors to add some negotiation, preferable before it's
>> published as XEP.
> I agree, we are going to be developing a session negotiation mechanism over
> time:

I think a sensible baseline, as I noted in the other thread (to which
I need to reply again) is using caps to signal support. This at least
does away with the most terrible "Doesn't support it, but gets spammed
anyway" case.


More information about the Standards mailing list