[Standards] RFC vs privacy lists

Paul Aurich paul at darkrain42.org
Sun May 1 23:51:47 UTC 2011


And Matthew Wild spoke on 04/28/2011 06:19 AM, saying:
> On 28 April 2011 14:13, Yann Leboulanger <asterix at lagaule.org> wrote:
>> Le 28/04/2011 10:31, Dave Cridland a écrit :
>>> Or there's XEP-0191.
>>>
>>> What prevents people using that? I know you can't do invisibility
>>> through it, but there's always XEP-0186 for that. Otherwise it seems
>>> vastly simpler and a much clearer specification, too.

+1

>> Unfortunatly the goal of this XEP is not met: latest ejabberd and prosody
>> don't implement that XEP. I've not checked other servers.
>>
> 
> http://code.google.com/p/prosody-modules/wiki/mod_blocking
> 
> It's waiting for client support, testing, and feedback before we can
> include it in a release.

Pidgin has supported this for a while now (a bit over two years).  I've
tested it with jabberd2's implementation.

> Regards,
> Matthew

~Paul

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20110501/1f1330d5/attachment.sig>


More information about the Standards mailing list