[Standards] updated Sensors proposal

Mario Bergés marioberges at cmu.edu
Tue May 17 17:14:57 UTC 2011

Thanks Peter.

We have been following the messages on the list, waiting for some feedback
on our proposed XEP (http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/sensors.html). Not
much has happened since the last message (1 month ago).

I wanted to reiterate that we would very much like to hear from others
whether Sensor Over XMPP (SOX) covers their needs in terms of sensing and/or
actuation. We have been involved in discussions with other folks who are
developing sensing middleware and have tried to modify the payload schema to
fit their needs, and we'd like to do the same based on your feedback.

The bottom line is that we would like to work with all of you to make sure
this XEP can address your needs, and we are willing to modify in any way to
make this possible.


- Mario

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>wrote:

> On 4/14/11 2:15 AM, Charles Spirakis wrote:
> > As Peter mentioned, we are very interested in seeing if people think
> > SOX can meet their sensing and control needs and if not, what aspect
> > of the proposal could be modified to meet those needs.
> Thanks for the explanation. I have pinged some folks I know working with
> XMPP in the smart grid space but I don't think they've reviewed the spec
> yet. I'll ping them again now that the new version is out.
> Peter
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20110517/d3e2b779/attachment.html>

More information about the Standards mailing list