[Standards] request for reviews: XEP-0045 v1.25rc5
Kurt.Zeilenga at Isode.COM
Tue Sep 27 13:08:04 UTC 2011
On Sep 26, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> I think one ought to allow for extension elements in the subject change message. For instance, say the subject change message is delayed at an occupant's server, which hence adds a <delay/> element. Hence, I think it should be a <subject/> child with a <body/>.
whoops. s/with/without/ here.
> I don't mind if it has other children than <subject/>, but existing
> implementations require there to be no <body/> on a subject change,
> and I see no reason to break them at this stage.
More information about the Standards