[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Unique Room Names for Multi-User Chat

Bernard Aboba bernard.aboba at gmail.com
Tue Sep 27 17:28:58 UTC 2011


> Depending on what the problem one is trying to solve by server generation
> of the name instead of client side generation, possibly so.
>
> If reservation is desired and to be required of servers, that that should
> be clearly stated.
>
> I note that this would prevent a user from asking the server to get them a
> unique name and passing that to another user for the actual room creation.
>
> Without understanding the problem folks are trying to solve with this, hard
> to say whether reservations is desirable or not.
>

[BA] Consider a scenario in which an XMPP MUC room is used to share
information between police, medical and fire departments relating to an
emergency call (perhaps one from a disabled user utilizing XEP-0301).

You would not want an emergency caller to share an MUC room with other
callers, so that a room with a unique name would need to be created.

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20110927/7fd12df2/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list