[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0308 (Last Message Correction)

Mark Rejhon markybox at gmail.com
Mon Aug 13 20:32:02 UTC 2012


On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Philipp Hancke
<fippo at goodadvice.pages.de> wrote:
> Am 13.08.2012 22:05, schrieb Mark Rejhon:
>>
>> In addition, it would likely be non-backwards compatible in a
>> "graceful degrade manner", e.g. MUC
>
> [...]
>>
>> The way both me and Kevin has currently specified, ensures that both
>> 0301 and 0308 will work and interop fine in mixed-MUC situations.
>
> Frankly, I would  recommend MUCs to filter out any RTT stuff. Unless they
> want to take part in amplification attacks of course. But that's not for the
> 0308 LC, is a problem that 0045 has in general and only shows when dealing
> with heavy traffic.

Not an option.  Some demos of Next Generation 911 uses MUC combined
with XEP-0301

Better option: Server control of enabling/disabling 0301 on a
per-chat-room basis

Mark Rejhon



More information about the Standards mailing list