[Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0301 (In-Band Real Time Text) - Logic of example 1.
gunnar.hellstrom at omnitor.se
Tue Aug 14 20:22:09 UTC 2012
On 2012-08-14 03:09, Mark Rejhon wrote:
> Barry may have presented a compromise I can accept. The first
> (introductory) stanza is still full word, and the second and third is
> not too difficult for most readers to figure out.
> On 2012-08-13 8:44 PM, "Barry Dingle" <btdingle at gmail.com
> <mailto:btdingle at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Regarding the example in 4.1, I agree with Gunnar. The first
> example gives the wrong initial impression by sending only
> complete words in the <rtt/>. (It made me go and double check how
> the protocol worked.)
> I suggest that we keep the first <rtt/> as is, but slightly change
> the second and third <rtt/> text contents to:
> *<t>my J**</t>*
> This retains the readability but also shows that the <rtt/> is
> sent independently of word boundaries.
This was item #5 Let us try to keep track of the issue numbers and
I accept the solution.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards