[Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0301 (In-Band Real Time Text) - Logic of example 1.

Gunnar Hellström gunnar.hellstrom at omnitor.se
Tue Aug 14 20:22:09 UTC 2012


On 2012-08-14 03:09, Mark Rejhon wrote:
>
> Barry may have presented a compromise I can accept.  The first 
> (introductory) stanza is still full word, and the second and third is 
> not too difficult for most readers to figure out.
>
> On 2012-08-13 8:44 PM, "Barry Dingle" <btdingle at gmail.com 
> <mailto:btdingle at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Mark,
>
>     Regarding the example in 4.1, I agree with Gunnar. The first
>     example gives the wrong initial impression by sending only
>     complete words in the <rtt/>. (It made me go and double check how
>     the protocol worked.)
>
>     I suggest that we keep the first <rtt/> as is, but slightly change
>     the second and third <rtt/> text contents to:
>
>     *<t>my J**</t>*
>
>     and
>
>     *<t>uliet!</t>*
>
>     respectively.
>
>     This retains the readability but also shows that the <rtt/> is
>     sent independently of word boundaries.
>
>     Cheers,
>     /Barry
>

This was item #5  Let us try to keep track of the issue numbers and 
their state.

I accept the solution.

/Gunnar
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20120814/5781ab8c/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list