[Standards] XEP-296 problem?

Kevin Smith kevin at kismith.co.uk
Wed Aug 15 15:48:08 UTC 2012


On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Yann Leboulanger <asterix at lagaule.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wonder what should I do in this situation:
> user A and B are connected with resource r1. They that, so messages go from
> A/r1 to B/r1.
>
> user B connects a second client with resource r2 with a higher priority.
>
> Where should go next message of user A?

While I think 296 promotes unlocking more often than it should, in
this case I agree with it - the next message should go to the bare
JID. That a new resource has come online suggests a significant change
in the user's state.

/K



More information about the Standards mailing list