[Standards] XEP-296 problem?

Kevin Smith kevin at kismith.co.uk
Wed Aug 15 15:49:22 UTC 2012


On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Yann Leboulanger <asterix at lagaule.org> wrote:
> Same thing if B just go away or na? so we cannot continue en encrypted
> conversation if we go away?

Conversations with B shouldn't be unlocked while B has a single,
unchanging, resource. (I think this may be in disagreement with 296)

/K



More information about the Standards mailing list