[Standards] XEP-296 problem?

Matthew Miller linuxwolf at outer-planes.net
Wed Aug 15 16:07:30 UTC 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Aug 15, 2012, at 09:49, Kevin Smith wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Yann Leboulanger <asterix at lagaule.org> wrote:
>> Same thing if B just go away or na? so we cannot continue en encrypted
>> conversation if we go away?
> 
> Conversations with B shouldn't be unlocked while B has a single,
> unchanging, resource. (I think this may be in disagreement with 296)

It might be in disagreement, but I think we can change it.


- - m&m

Matthew A. Miller
<http://goo.gl/LK55L>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQK8lCAAoJEJq6Ou0cgrSPJjsH/1efng8bjie1fEWiw1gNymZv
L1kO3YijDLDQfxwvmr3sMX2DzJVkx6xJxi5/dhArsRjecgPlO/H9IxY79koRqHCY
GyqXcSe/ECgKMoJPVCCnYwQl9LsCqRaonsRfA3uXuBXsTzQM1iAAuTJkJW8cjfej
vHoBIMQoB/EKVDbhNQ5+RAQEFcUwP7GVBmnLHdbdOlXGsM8QnEjTQwtX5uUCdWMW
ORyqM98XSnIOfFaHbxrum/WmtW8DiuuqmbYuRSxLhLz0qSDSAJ6Nq/EhWNPGtDdV
EJuw1n9PBYX9MTalIpH1xdgMeJ+ddBc8RF3DzAB+rgTR+tnflFrGeypig3oyV8k=
=XNS5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Standards mailing list