[Standards] Call for Experience: Advancement of XEP-0071 (XHTML-IM) to Final

Sergey Dobrov binary at jrudevels.org
Tue Aug 21 08:57:36 UTC 2012

Btw, often implementation of XHTML-IM conflicts with internal
hyperlinks/smiles/plain text formatting like *this*. Maybe it will be
useful to add recommendation to switch any these parsers off when a
client have a deal with XHTML-IM message?

On 08/01/2012 03:58 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> At its meeting on July 25, 2012, the XMPP Council agreed to issue a
> "Call for Experience" regarding XEP-0071 (XHTML-IM), in preparation for
> perhaps advancing this specification from Draft to Final in the XSF's
> standards process. To help the Council decide whether this XEP is ready
> to advance to a status of Final, the Council would like to gather the
> following information:
> 1. What software has implemented XEP-0071? Please note that the protocol
> must be implemented in at least two separate codebases (and preferably
> more) in order to advance from Draft to Final.
> 2. Have developers experienced any problems with the protocol as defined
> in XEP-0071? If so, please describe the problems and, if possible,
> suggested solutions.
> 3. Is the text of XEP-0071 clear and unambiguous? Are more examples
> needed? Is the conformance language (MAY/SHOULD/MUST) appropriate? Have
> developers found the text confusing at all? Please describe any
> suggestions you have for improving the text.
> If you have any comments about advancing XEP-0071 from Draft to Final,
> please provide them by the close of business on Friday, August 31, 2012.
> After the Call for Experience, this XEP might undergo revisions to
> address feedback received, after which it will be presented to the XMPP
> Council for voting to a status of Final.
> You can review the specification here:
> http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0071.html
> Please send all feedback to the standards at xmpp.org discussion list.
> Thanks!
> Peter

With best regards,
Sergey Dobrov,
XMPP Developer and JRuDevels.org founder.

More information about the Standards mailing list