[Standards] disco identity for "client/smartphone"?

Philipp Hancke fippo at goodadvice.pages.de
Tue Dec 11 20:20:34 UTC 2012


Am 11.12.2012 20:23, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
[...]
> In the ancient days, client/phone was a dumb phone. Now we have smart
> phones that can do more. We also have tablets, too.

desk phones are still around. Some of them aren't even considered voip 
yet ;-)

> However, Kev makes a point that we probably don't really need
> different identities, since we can base client behavior and UI on the
> supported features (caps/disco), not the advertised identity of the
> device.

caps are much more fine-grained. Category seems to be used mainly for 
displaying nice icons for different kinds of entities...



More information about the Standards mailing list