[Standards] long specs
stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Feb 15 20:07:12 UTC 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 2/15/12 12:48 PM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2012, at 8:26 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I'd be willing to work on this, but I want to make sure that
>> people think there's value in doing so.
> Personally, I not sure what I hate more, overly long documents or
> specifications unnecessarily split over multiple documents.
> I don't consider XEP 45 or XEP 60 to be overly long.
Half the feedback I receive is (a) it's too hard to read a long spec.
The other half is (b) it's too hard to read multiple specs. For
XEP-0060, the feedback is heavily weighted toward (a). For XEP-0045,
it's about evenly weighted. My conclusion is that we really need to
split up XEP-0060, and that splitting XEP-0045 into user vs. admin use
cases would be helpful.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Standards