[Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0276 (Presence Decloaking)

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Tue Jul 17 15:44:51 UTC 2012


On 7/17/12 2:34 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Kim Alvefur <zash at zash.se> wrote:
>> If we want the `reason` bit to be flexible, why not make it some
>> combination of a text label and a registry, perhaps similar to stanza
>> errors.
>>
>> Maybe reuse the features (XEP 30, Disco) registry, like:
>> <decloak>
>>  <reason ver="urn:xmpp:jingle:apps:rtp:audio">Voice call</reason>
>> </decloak>
> 
> Or, we could dispense with the reason entirely and just leave it at
> something human readable?
> 
> <decloak>
>  <reason>I want to call you</reason>
> </decloak>
> 
> Including the use case seems to be somewhat conflating negotiation
> (which specs generally sort out themselves via Jingle, or just aren't
> negotiated) with discovery, which I think decloaking aids with.
> 
> Cutting it out makes this very simple and doesn't seem to harm us.

+1, I think. I don't believe that this would be used in an automated
fashion.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/







More information about the Standards mailing list