[Standards] NEW: XEP-0308 (Last Message Correction)- Interop with XEP 0301 RTT
markybox at gmail.com
Fri Jul 20 17:15:14 UTC 2012
> I still don't understand your resistance to disco, and the argument "the
>> software is buggy!" is specious at best.
>> No, no -- this one is different, evaluated from a different perspective.
> This is a completely different matter from the "fallback method", as this
> list simply illustrates optimization to the protocol for maximum
> compatibility between a variety of combinations of *XEP-0301 and XEP-0301*-- it is not something any of my implementations ever plans to do. (the
> fallback method is for a completely different reason).
Oops, XEP-0301 and XEP-0308.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards