[Standards] NEW: XEP-0308 (Last Message Correction)- Interop with XEP 0301 RTT
stpeter at stpeter.im
Fri Jul 20 20:57:36 UTC 2012
On 7/20/12 2:54 PM, Mark Rejhon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Gunnar Hellström
> <gunnar.hellstrom at omnitor.se <mailto:gunnar.hellstrom at omnitor.se>> wrote:
> Would it not be safer to say that you must support receiving id= and
> reacting properly if you declare support of both XEP-0301 and
> XEP-0308, and that you shall not send id attributes if negotiation
> for support of both XEP-0308 and XEP-0301 fail?
> If several people say so, I can consider that.
> But I agree with Kevin that XEP-0301 and XEP-0308 can be usable by
> senders and/or recipients not using 'id'
> I'd rather fix the rest of the spec to be unambigiously clear about
> business rules -- let me know if there are confusing sentences in
> XEP-0301 that can be clarified, to ensure spec compliance (for full
> XEP-0301 / XEP-308 interop)
Sounds reasonable; in any case, let's all review version 0.4 of XEP-0301
with that goal in mind.
More information about the Standards