[Standards] XEP-0301 0.5 comments [Sections 1 through 5]
markybox at gmail.com
Tue Jul 24 17:15:44 UTC 2012
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Gregg Vanderheiden <gv at trace.wisc.edu>wrote:
> I agree
> the word by word is often brought up -- but never implemented. It make
> little sense to add this here and confuse the discussion. You can't do
> word by word without XEP-0301 == and if doing XEP-0301 you can do NT or
> WbWord or SbSentence or CbClause whatever you want. But I would not get
> into discussing or mentioning them except to say that you can allow any of
> them as options in a client but should be on the receiving side as a
> Talking about doing word by word but sending fragments if person is slow
> etc is just confusing this standard. Keep it simple I think.
That's why I kept the Introductory Example quite simple for this.
In order of preference, I like:
1. Natural Typing
3. Word Transmission
4. Fragment Transmission
5. Whole Message Transmission (unless in an "email" mood)
The Introduction goes as high as possible (#3) without going into the
Right now, votes are roughly evenly split (half a dozen Yea's, and half a
dozen Nay's over the last 2 years), and I refuse to budget at the moment,
barring a huge vote surge in one direction or another....
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards