[Standards] XEP-0301 0.5 comments [Clarification about Client Switching / Single JID Handling]
kevin at kismith.co.uk
Fri Jul 27 08:44:39 UTC 2012
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Mark Rejhon <markybox at gmail.com> wrote:
> The recipient-side single JID handling still continue to provide
> excellent UX in all situations even in differing behaviours (e.g.
> XEP-0296 followed or not, resource locking followed or not, Google
> Talk-style server carbons or not, etc.) .... It is thus my opinion
> that while senders should still send to full JID and recipients should
> still do disco with full JID, the internal storage of real-time
> messages can be indexed by bare JID.
OK. I don't feel strongly enough about this to make it worth much more
discussion - if anyone else has opinions I suspect they'll share them.
More information about the Standards