[Standards] Contradiction in XEP-277 (Microblogging over XMPP).

Sergey Dobrov binary at jrudevels.org
Fri Jul 27 09:13:24 UTC 2012


Yes, you're right, it needs to be read as pubsub#publish_model, I'll fix
it in the next revision of the XEP, thanks for your feedback!

On 07/26/2012 09:53 PM, Marco Cirillo wrote:
> There's a "fairly" contradictory text for the open access model in the
> extension,
> 
> Paragraph 4.2 point 3 cites:
> << The "pubsub#access_model" SHOULD be set to "open" to allow any user
> to comment to a post. Other values are suitable too according to the
> user's settings. >>
> 
> While the description for the open access model in XEP-60 cites:
> << Any entity may subscribe to the node (i.e., without the necessity for
> subscription approval) and any entity may retrieve items from the node
> (i.e., without being subscribed); this SHOULD be the default access
> model for generic pubsub services. >>
> 
> Which means that everyone can subscribe and retrieve items from the
> node, but _not_ post to it as 4.2.3 in XEP-277 says.
> 
> Regards.
> 


-- 
With best regards,
Sergey Dobrov,
XMPP Developer and JRuDevels.org founder.






More information about the Standards mailing list