[Standards] Call for Experience: Advancement of XEP-0071 (XHTML-IM) to Final
stpeter at stpeter.im
Mon Oct 15 14:37:10 UTC 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 10/12/12 7:53 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 10/12/12 4:07 AM, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
>> On 10/11/2012 10:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> On 9/27/12 5:32 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> (I also wonder why we don't support <q/> for inline
>> Yes, it seems that the set of allowed tags should be reviewed
> Maybe. :) I'm sure we had good reasons for the limited subset we
> defined in 2003-2004, and I am not sure we want to reconsider every
> element and attribute when the XEP is so mature.
I really don't want to re-open a discussion about each and every XHTML
element, so I'm sorry about the comment on <q/> for inline quotation.
In any case, what's in XEP-0071 is a recommended profile, so
developers are free to support more structural elements if desired.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Standards