[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0308 (Last Message Correction)

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Thu Sep 6 06:02:44 UTC 2012

Oh, if you take it out of context like that, then yes... I was talking
about my suggestion of a removable prefix.
On Sep 6, 2012 3:37 AM, "Mark Rejhon" <markybox at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net> wrote:
> > Although this needs some thought to handle XHTML-IM, and it may prove
> > impossible - though we've done worse things with FLOTs before.
> Been away, so replying late, too.
> From first glance, XEP-0308 doesn't seem incompatible with XHTML-IM.
> It seems to be "naturally" usable with stanzas containing XHTML-IM --
> just send a standard XHTML-IM message (with both <body/> and <html/>)
> but also include a <replace/> in stanza.  Problem solved.   The exact
> same reasonable UI suggestion can be followed as well.
> Can you explain the situation of impossibility?   I am interested in your
> POV.
> Thanks,
> Mark Rejhon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20120906/e813630d/attachment.html>

More information about the Standards mailing list