[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0308 (Last Message Correction)
dave at cridland.net
Thu Sep 6 06:02:44 UTC 2012
Oh, if you take it out of context like that, then yes... I was talking
about my suggestion of a removable prefix.
On Sep 6, 2012 3:37 AM, "Mark Rejhon" <markybox at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net> wrote:
> > Although this needs some thought to handle XHTML-IM, and it may prove
> > impossible - though we've done worse things with FLOTs before.
> Been away, so replying late, too.
> From first glance, XEP-0308 doesn't seem incompatible with XHTML-IM.
> It seems to be "naturally" usable with stanzas containing XHTML-IM --
> just send a standard XHTML-IM message (with both <body/> and <html/>)
> but also include a <replace/> in stanza. Problem solved. The exact
> same reasonable UI suggestion can be followed as well.
> Can you explain the situation of impossibility? I am interested in your
> Mark Rejhon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards