[Standards] Comments on Chat Markers

Kevin Smith kevin at kismith.co.uk
Sun Jul 7 07:57:46 UTC 2013

On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Spencer MacDonald
<spencer.macdonald.other at gmail.com> wrote:
> Before I send in my update with the above changes, I am think about adding a
> requirement that all messages that can be marked, should have an "allowed"
> child element.
>  <allowed xmlns='urn:xmpp:chat-markers:0'>
> This means that messages containing only Chat States, Delivery Receipts etc
> are not included in Chat Markers and this will network traffic for redundant
> Chat Markers.
> Does anyone have an opinion on this?

Sounds reasonable - although I'm not sure 'allowed' represents what
you're trying to express (or I didn't understand). Would 'markable' be


More information about the Standards mailing list