[Standards] e2e privacy for XMPP Re: RFC 3923 (e2e with S/MIME) and OpenPGP

Steffen Larsen zooldk at gmail.com
Mon Nov 18 12:38:01 UTC 2013


On 18 Nov 2013, at 13:07, Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz at ping.de> wrote:

> Simon Tennant:
>> IMHO, e2e security would probably make more sense as a XEP and working
>> group that has the time to zoom into all the implementation details.
> Can that be solved by an XEP ?
> What about this IETF draft? (I still have to read it)
> End-to-End Object Encryption and Signatures for the Extensible Messaging
> and Presence Protocol (XMPP)
> draft-miller-xmpp-e2e-06
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-miller-xmpp-e2e/
> There exist people who mention XMPP as belonging to "faulty
> technologies" for which they want to create alternatives:
> http://youbroketheinternet.org/
> And I try to find out what can be done to improve XMPP regarding
> security and privacy.

Well you can “always” run XMPP on top of TOR if you like that, if it is the S2S routing that bothers you. :-)

> Cheers,
> Andreas
>> On 18 November 2013 10:30, Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz at ping.de
>> <mailto:a.kuckartz at ping.de>> wrote:
>>    Peter Saint-Andre some time ago wrote:
>>> On 7/16/13 4:27 AM, Carlo v. Loesch wrote:
>>>> Since XMPP isn't suitable for keeping meta-data private I would
>>>> presume that e2e privacy is out of scope for this mailing list,
>>>> really.
>>> True.
>>    Where would the topic e2e privacy for XMPP be "in scope" ?
>>    Cheers,
>>    Andreas

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4130 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20131118/fa24ad52/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list