[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Client State Indication
xramtsov at gmail.com
Tue Aug 19 16:21:41 UTC 2014
Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:30:18 +0100
Matthew Wild <mwild1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> There are so many different approaches and optimisations (as you just
> demonstrated in your message!). I don't feel this XEP is the right
> place to document them, I think there is a lot of room for
> experimentation. I want to leave implementations up to server
> developers, deployments and (if the server allows it) client and user
> preference. If good ones are found, they can be documented in separate
> XEPs if necessary (and reference CSI).
> This XEP is just about giving the server more information about when
> it would be more appropriate to apply some kinds of optimisation.
I disagree. We need the exact finite state machine (like it's done in
good RFCs, see SIP transaction FSM or TCP FSM) which gives the
straightforward way to implement such optimizations. Otherwise I don't
see the XEP is useful.
More information about the Standards