[Standards] XEP 313 error handling
dave at cridland.net
Sun Dec 7 13:24:59 UTC 2014
On 7 December 2014 at 12:31, Kevin Smith <kevin.smith at isode.com> wrote:
> I propose we roll back the sentinel and iq result handling to where they
> were originally, and have the iq terminate the results, either with a
> result (success) or error (failure).
Partly because I think it's simpler in this case, and partly because as a
general protocol pattern, I would prefer <iq get/set> -> <some payload
stanzas> -> <iq result/error>, and I believe this is what our current
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards