[Standards] XEP 313 error handling

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Sun Dec 7 13:24:59 UTC 2014


On 7 December 2014 at 12:31, Kevin Smith <kevin.smith at isode.com> wrote:

> I propose we roll back the sentinel and iq result handling to where they
> were originally, and have the iq terminate the results, either with a
> result (success) or error (failure).
>

I agree.

Partly because I think it's simpler in this case, and partly because as a
general protocol pattern, I would prefer <iq get/set> -> <some payload
stanzas> -> <iq result/error>, and I believe this is what our current
patterns are.

Dave.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20141207/c41fd2b2/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list