[Standards] Blocking command and Privacy Lists
dave at cridland.net
Mon Dec 22 16:31:15 UTC 2014
On 22 December 2014 at 14:47, Holger Weiß <holger at zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> * Kurt Zeilenga <kurt.zeilenga at isode.com> [2014-12-22 05:31]:
> > I think if anything in XEP 191 needs to change, it's the discussion of
> > how one maps XEP 191 onto XEP 4 privacy lists that should change. It
> > should be clearly stated that the blocking entity is required to perform
> > the mapping in such a way that all communications with the blocked JID
> > are blocked.
> And how should that entity map privacy rules that just block _some_ of
> the communication back to XEP-0191 rules?
XEP-0191 maps to XEP-0016, not the other way around. I think internally,
I'd mark the privacy lists that are really XEP-0191.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards