dave at cridland.net
Mon Dec 29 17:53:53 UTC 2014
On 29 December 2014 at 17:12, Sam Whited <sam at samwhited.com> wrote:
> Regardless, I think this is out of the scope of what the OTR document
> would define.
I think it'd be far more useful to define what current OTR usage is, and
what it protects against (and what it doesn't).
Writing what OTR *should* be doing is a whole other document - just as
important, but I'm keener on seeing the first.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards