[Standards] BOSH patches, hopefully the last before final

Christian Schudt christian.schudt at gmx.de
Sun Feb 2 18:23:54 UTC 2014


Doesn't that apply to most Draft XEPs?

I am currently working my way through all Draft XEPs and implement them and noticed, that most of them were last updated during the mid-2000s and in Draft status probably even longer.

Christian


Am 02.02.2014 um 19:10 schrieb Winfried Tilanus:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> On 02/02/2014 01:29 PM, Christian Schudt wrote:
> 
> Hi Christian,
> 
>> I am of course not in the position to decide about such things
>> (may vs should vs must…) and I can hardly weigh up the real impact
>> of such a change, but I thought status "Draft" is liberal enough to
>> allow such changes. (If not, I'd be interested in what kind of
>> changes are allowed)
> 
> Well, you sure put the finger on the sore spot: the BOSH XEPs have
> been 'draft' way too long. In practice they are used already as if
> they are final. So I would take more care when changing BOSH then when
> changing other 'draft' XEPs.
> 
> Winfried
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> 
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJS7on5AAoJEHZ7UH0X6Ldco9cP/jRiqa31r8HTGp0r9wmzhqOy
> mqWAGjWl8siGfOeXG5HH8Ocrh0iNRkJHOyl59EzRcmHpPVq4cxa0g4uyUuZmZSHx
> 1Dv3vYJgCfTjzEm+dm9YuzpkB19AmM+Khlxu94unMXMPtD7hhhDqCnpdDuppe4qt
> /f3mq3cUAvgZ/gUbqYKwyO4VwB5bc/P8xh69+O4avlSYO7P5hdBAof7h2IJ8Gin6
> uGcPq3UXUdnmfHddaLm1KGimYQxALE2WE+D+Tf+xFAU+glz5Pe3IhJEujCDovoXW
> lDMsAq6JlZbJCjx+JAcRX9NYuTj7bdmXvFlKtS4KRgjedOuBqWZp5LcmlSR/9Bvt
> 82cp6PT+R5h0xcXLXBXneabYjnMBkCFleCdrhPII6FjBCKnr6W08sJnmAtOplBfL
> pSqrmSD0yj6lEPUeaNaYibC+VFdWINFdTIt1Q3F/yFZj+NWVtsjQSoy4nCIotL53
> MZ6mluNTaubIYkYnV3Gtif9s/a4WvimgB9Ie44qjxD+sP+MBlhSuDj+3FCPzWetD
> 6fYnsBf0d2Yqqn3vYfVaiC1xyfLVyNSqdIi6GeZJl87m0EsjQxXzbjlu0DWp7UzE
> o5FOT1sLp26zDLaGsulwMAtymilvXJXRZPYkVOQOQvUzSi4Sw+4h7do8kN9+xcx6
> XpvNTL4HgA5ZZkV15vEE
> =Yzmt
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Standards mailing list