[Standards] XEP-0045 MUC should mention component

Graham King graham at gkgk.org
Wed Jul 16 18:33:42 UTC 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

XEP-0045 (Multi-User Chat) doesn't say that it should be implemented
as a Component (XEP-0114). I think it should mention that.

I remember getting quite confused when I first worked on implementing
MUCs because I was new to XMPP. All the examples use a sub-domain
(conference), but it doesn't say that you have to. If you try doing
MUCs on the same domain as the main server (i.e. without component
protocol), the disco gets confusing.

Is there a reason that's not mentioned (other than it being obvious to
everyone else)? If not, could I send in a patch to get the ball rolling?

Thanks,
Graham
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=JRhv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Standards mailing list