[Standards] Fwd: Minutes 2014-04-23

Ben Langfeld ben at langfeld.me
Thu May 8 11:03:35 UTC 2014


Did the vote not already fall in favour of accepting rayo-clustering as
experimental? I've additionally responded to concerns about the motivation
for its standardisation in the thread on that subject, and I feel the
argument holds.


On 2 May 2014 10:45, Kevin Smith <kevin at kismith.co.uk> wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Kevin Smith
> Date: Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Minutes 2014-04-23
> To: XMPP Council
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Kevin Smith <kevin at kismith.co.uk> wrote:
> > Room logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2014-04-23/
> >
> > 1) Roll call.
> > Lance, Philipp, Matt, Kev present. Tobias absent.
> >
> > 2) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/signing-forms.html
> > Accept as Experimental
> >
> > No objection from Lance. Others have a fortnight to object.
>
> Temporarily -1 on the basis that I don't think the preamble with links
> to opinion pieces on blogs is appropriate.
>
> Not objecting to the proposal itself, but I'm not at all convinced
> that use of this for IBR would be a good idea.
>
>
> > 3) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/rayo-clustering.html
> > Accept as Experimental
> >
> > Lance/Philipp to post their objections to the council/standards lists.
>
> I'd like my position to count as -1 for the moment, but I might change
> my mind if a convincing argument is made on-list why clustering should
> be standardised.
>
> /K
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20140508/755098f0/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list