[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0322 (Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Format)
quae at daurnimator.com
Wed Oct 22 15:32:07 UTC 2014
On 22 October 2014 09:57, Tobias Markmann <tmarkmann at googlemail.com> wrote:
> I think using a more secure hash function would be beneficial for reducing
> code. Secure wireless constrained applications are likely to already
> include a high security cryptographic hash function. Using this hash
> function would avoid the need of implementing MD5 at all. Maybe, hash
> agility could also be useful in this case. So clients, I think this is the
> main deployment target for as constrained device, can pick the one already
> available. Servers which are likely to have more power can then simply use
> the same hash as the client.
I would think SHA-1 a better choice than MD5 at least.
And clients will already need it for capabilities:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards